Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Economy

US tech CEOs admit they want AI monopoly & ‘unipolar world’, blocking China’s competition

Big Tech oligarchs in Silicon Valley fear Chinese AI companies like DeepSeek. Billionaire Donald Trump backer Peter Thiel admits they want monopolies, arguing “competition is for losers”. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said the US must maintain a “unipolar world”.

US China AI monopoly Silicon Valley Big Tech

The CEO of Anthropic, a US AI company backed by Amazon and Google, argued that the government must impose heavy restrictions on China in order to maintain a monopoly on artificial intelligence technology.

If the US government can block China from getting advanced semiconductors, we will “live in a unipolar world, where only the US and its allies have these models”, wrote Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei.

Calling for more aggressive sanctions on China, Amodei warned, “Well-enforced export controls are the only thing that can prevent China from getting millions of chips, and are therefore the most important determinant of whether we end up in a unipolar or bipolar world”.

This mindset, which is common in Silicon Valley, explains why US Big Tech corporations have been so afraid of emerging competitors in China.

It is widely assumed that capitalism is based on competition, but powerful US tech billionaire Peter Thiel argues the opposite. “Actually, capitalism and competition are opposites”, he wrote back in 2014 in the Wall Street Journal.

“Competition is for losers”, asserted Thiel, a Republican Party mega-donor who is a close ally of US President Donald Trump and who previously employed Vice President JD Vance.

Thiel insisted that US tech companies should “look to build a monopoly”, because, as he put it, “Monopoly is the condition of every successful business”.

China’s DeepSeek challenges US Big Tech monopoly

The Chinese company DeepSeek has shaken up the global debate about artificial intelligence.

It was taken for granted for years that the United States was leading the world in the development of AI, and that US Big Tech corporations based in Silicon Valley would inevitably dominate the industry.

Seemingly out of nowhere, however, DeepSeek published an AI model that is even better than those created by the leading US company OpenAI, which is half owned by Microsoft.

What was even more remarkable was that the DeepSeek model requires a small fraction of the computing power and energy used by US AI models.

The small Chinese company reportedly developed it for just around US $6 million. Meanwhile, US Big Tech corporations are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars per year into AI capital expenditure.

The cherry on top was that DeepSeek released its R-1 model with an open-source license, making it free for anyone in the world to download and run on their computer at home.

It is not an exaggeration to say that this was utterly ground breaking.

US government seeks to restrict Chinese technology

When DeepSeek went viral in the last week of January, quickly establishing itself as the most popular app in the United States, the government promptly declared it to be a threat to “national security”.

The US Navy immediately banned the use of DeepSeek, claiming that it has “security and ethical concerns” — despite the fact that its models are open source.

Washington also sought to tighten its restrictions on China. Trump launched a trade war on China in his first term, levying tariffs and sanctioning high-tech companies like Huawei.

The US economic war on China was significantly expanded by the Joe Biden administration, which imposed export restrictions to prevent China from getting access to high-end chips that were assumed to be needed to train artificial intelligence models.

In response to DeepSeek’s success, the US government has threatened third countries, especially Singapore, warning them that, if they sell semiconductors to China, they will be hit with heavy sanctions and tariffs.

Biden administration Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo admitted in 2021 that Washington’s goal is “to slow down China’s rate of innovation”.

However, what the US government is learning is that every time it tries to ban one popular Chinese technology, another takes its place.

The US government temporarily banned TikTok, after unsuccessfully pressuring the hit app’s Chinese parent company ByteDance to sell it to a US Big Tech monopoly. But what happened? Many Americans instead moved over to another Chinese app called RedNote – which is ironically named Xiaohongshu, or “Little Red Book” in Chinese.

This was mere weeks before DeepSeek overtook ChatGPT as the most popular app in the United States.

DeepSeek is just the beginning. US venture capitalists have cautioned that engineers in China are developing at least “10 top tier models, all trained from scratch”. Major Chinese companies like Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance are involved, as well as many lesser-known names.

US Senate discusses “stealing” China’s engineers and banning its apps

In Washington, the US government is deliberating plans to ban popular Chinese apps and “steal their best engineers”.

These proposals were raised at a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington on 30 January, titled “The Malign Influence of the People’s Republic of China at Home and Abroad”.

“Let’s steal their best engineers”, stated Melanie Hart, a former State Department official who was invited to give testimony.

“China’s national engineers developed the DeepSeek AI model that surprised the world this week”, she continued. “You know, we’d be better off if the engineers behind that were working here in the US, at US universities and US companies”.

Hart is an anti-China activist who previously oversaw the State Department’s semiconductor strategy. She is now the director of the Global China Hub at the Atlantic Council, a hawkish Washington, DC-based think tank funded by the US government, NATO, and weapons corporations.

Another China hawk invited to give testimony in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing was Peter Mattis, a CIA veteran who serves as president of the Jamestown Foundation, a neoconservative think tank that is closely linked to the CIA. Mattis previously worked for the US House of Representatives Select Committee on the Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.

“What should we do about RedNote, and DeepSeek, and other platforms like that?”, asked Senator Pete Ricketts, a pro-Trump Republican from Nebraska.

Mattis proposed that Chinese apps should either be forced to be sold to a US company, or banned.

“I think for those kinds of platforms, you have to adopt the same approach that was applied to TikTok, that either it is sort of removed from the control, or it is no longer available in the app stores”, Mattis said.

“Great, thank you very much, Mr. Mattis”, replied Senator Ricketts in approval, clearly pleased at the policy recommendation.

US Big Tech billionaires say “competition is for losers”

China’s rapid advances have scared Big Tech corporations in the United States, demonstrating that they don’t truly want competition.

This was once admitted openly by the US tech billionaire Peter Thiel, in his September 2014 Wall Street Journal article “Competition Is for Losers”.

peter thiel competition is for losers monopoly tech wall street journal

Explaining his view that “capitalism and competition are opposites”, Thiel wrote, “Capitalism is premised on the accumulation of capital, but under perfect competition, all profits get competed away”.

“Only one thing can allow a business to transcend the daily brute struggle for survival: monopoly profits”, he said.

“Monopoly is the condition of every successful business”, Thiel declared, adding, “All happy companies are different: Each one earns a monopoly by solving a unique problem. All failed companies are the same: They failed to escape competition”.

After publishing that column, Thiel was invited to give a lecture with the same title at Stanford University, in a computer science course in October 2014.

Thiel opened his Stanford talk stating:

I have a single idée fixe that I’m completely obsessed with, on the business side, which is that, if you’re starting a company, if you’re the founder, entrepreneur, starting a company, you always want to aim for monopoly, and, you want to always avoid competition. And so, hence, competition is for losers – something we’ll be talking about today.

Sam Altman Peter Thiel monopoly competition is for losers Stanford

OpenAI CEO Sam Atlman invited tech billionaire Peter Thiel to Stanford to speak in defense of monopolies and against competition in 2014.

The man who invited Thiel to speak at Stanford in defense of monopolies was fellow Silicon Valley tech billionaire Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI.

OpenAI has lobbied the US government to take more action to cut off competition from Chinese companies like DeepSeek.

On 21 January 2025, just a day after returning to office, Trump invited Altman to the White House to announce the US government-backed “Stargate Project”, pledging $500 billion in investment related to AI.

Trump and Altman were joined by fellow billionaires Larry Ellison, the executive chairman of Oracle, and Masayoshi Son, the CEO of SoftBank.

Trump Sam Altman AI White House Stargate

US President Donald Trump and billionaires Sam Altman, Larry Ellison, and Masayoshi Son at the White House on 21 January 2025

Peter Thiel says capitalism is more important than democracy

Thiel’s argument that “capitalism and competition are opposites” was by no means meant as a criticism of capitalism. On the contrary, Thiel is an avowed defender of capitalism, and a self-declared “libertarian”.

In 2009, Thiel published an article explicitly arguing against democracy. It was published by the libertarian think tank the Cato Institute, which is funded by right-wing billionaires and a Who’s Who of large US corporations.

“I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible”, Thiel wrote.

“The 1920s were the last decade in American history during which one could be genuinely optimistic about politics”, he argued, lamenting that, “Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of ‘capitalist democracy’ into an oxymoron”.

In short, Thiel recognized that capitalism and democracy cannot simultaneously coexist – and as a billionaire oligarch, he naturally believes that capitalism is more important.

The USA is an oligarchy

Although he has extreme right-wing views, Thiel is by no means a fringe figure. He is one of the most powerful people in the United States.

In fact, Thiel is closely linked to US President Donald Trump, and he has funded many right-wing Republican politicians, including Trump himself.

Vice President JD Vance previously worked for Thiel, and the billionaire bankrolled his successful 2022 Senate campaign with $15 million in campaign contributions.

Trump has filled his administration with at least 13 billionaires, and has pledged to continue cutting taxes on them and their companies.

Trump clearly demonstrated to the world how the United States is an oligarchy when he invited the richest billionaires on the planet to sit with his cabinet members at his inauguration in Washington on 20 January.

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, who is now the world’s richest man, has an office in Trump’s White House. He was joined at the inauguration by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon; Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta; Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google and Alphabet; and Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple.

Together, these Big Tech oligarchs have nearly $1 trillion in wealth, which they amassed by establishing monopolies.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says US must block China’s AI progress to maintain “unipolar world”

Another US tech CEO, Dario Amodei, published an article in the Wall Street Journal in January asking Donald Trump to put further restrictions on Chinese competitors, so the United States can have a monopoly on artificial intelligence.

Amodei penned this article with co-author Matt Pottinger, a neoconservative China hawk and former US military intelligence officer who served as the deputy national security adviser to Trump in his first administration.

Like OpenAI, which is half owned by Microsoft, Anthropic portrays itself as a plucky “startup”, but its main investors are Big Tech monopolies Amazon and Google.

In the Wall Street Journal op-ed, Amodei and Pottinger complained that “China is trying to catch up” in AI. He argued that “the U.S. must lead the world in artificial intelligence to preserve national security”.

Dario Amodei Matt Pottinger China AI monopoly

Having a monopoly on AI will “establish a historic advantage for the U.S. and the free world”, they wrote, because “AI will likely become the most powerful and strategic technology in history”.

Controlling AI “could also extend American military pre-eminence”, stressed Amodei and Pottinger. But if the US doesn’t have a monopoly, they warned, “another nation—most likely China—could surpass us economically and militarily”.

To prevent China from competing, the tech CEO and his neocon co-author asked Trump to impose even more aggressive semiconductor controls, including government tracking of AI hardware exports.

In a follow-up article published a few weeks later at his personal website, Amodei argued that the rapid progress being made by Chinese AI companies like DeepSeek makes “export control policies even more existentially important”.

China must be blocked from getting “millions of chips”, Amodei wrote, because, “If they can [get chips], we’ll live in a bipolar world, where both the US and China have powerful AI models that will cause extremely rapid advances in science and technology”.

“If China can’t get millions of chips, we’ll (at least temporarily) live in a unipolar world, where only the US and its allies have these models”, he hoped. “Thus, in this world, the US and its allies might take a commanding and long-lasting lead on the global stage”.

The US tech CEO cautioned, “Well-enforced export controls are the only thing that can prevent China from getting millions of chips, and are therefore the most important determinant of whether we end up in a unipolar or bipolar world”.

7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. Eric Arthur Blair

    2025-02-03 at 05:10

    Two US commentators mention the irony that Deep Seek R1 was released shortly after Trump’s announcement of $500 billion funding for Larry Ellison’s Stargate AI. The cheaply developed (<$6 million), high performing, open source, free to use Deep Seek made a complete mockery of the bloated US economically parasitic model.

    https://youtu.be/BwCzinwo_bk?si=hBKkwG4K8e0rY36O

    Was this a form of warfare?
    From 9min55sec:
    "We (the USA) fight wars by blowing open the skulls of 5 year old Arab girls. China fights wars by creating free apps for us to use.. that actually help people…"

    • JonnyJames

      2025-02-03 at 11:16

      Good point. One has to ask if the ultimate goal of the oligarchy is to totally asset-strip the US (both so-called public and private sectors). Like the bloated MICIMATT expenditures, the efficacy of the purported policy is negligible, the real game is to fleece the public treasury. (kleptocracy).

  2. Eric Arthur Blair

    2025-02-03 at 05:21

    I may be out of line here but feel compelled to make some personal comments about Ben Norton. Why? Because I fear he may face a future of unfulfilled potential which will be a tragedy not only for him but for humanity.
    It has been said that the greatest tragedy of Lee Kuan Yew is that he ended up the leader of tiny Singapore rather than, say, China, which under Lee’s guidance would have risen to its true potential decades earlier. Oh well, better late than never.
    At minimum Ben Norton can be described as the Noam Chomsky of his generation and if he is to simply journey along in life in the same manner as now, he seems likely to end up as a professor of Geopolitical Economics in a Chinese or Latin American university, lecturing students and writing papers and books in 3 languages. What a waste.
    Far better if he could find a role as the Jeffrey Sachs of his generation, gaining a special appointment by Chinese academia to tour the world and provide practical economic advice based on Michael Hudson’s philosophical foundations. By doing so he could give rise to 100,000 Singapore’s around the world and dramatically transform billions of lives for the better.
    I keep mourning the unfulfilled potential of resource rich Argentina in particular and how, if Ben were given free reign to restructure Argentinian systems from the ground up, could transform it into a powerhouse of unimaginable prosperity for all their citizens, not just a rich few.
    Just sayin’

    • Energieerhaltungssatz

      2025-02-03 at 08:03

      “Joining us in the gallery is the true and legitimate president of Argentina – Ben Norton. Mr. President, please take this message back to your country.”

      And Lee Camp is the true and legitimate president of America.

      By the way, I really like, like, like, … the like button on CGTN. 😉
      https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-02-01/Truth-over-lies-U-S-reporter-s-bold-words-at-Potala-Palace-1AvktUI76Te/p.html

      And why can´t I select the Chinese language on CGTN?! 😀

      • Eric Arthur Blair

        2025-02-03 at 13:10

        Comedian Lee Camp can never become leader of a country because he lacks the essential qualification of playing the piano with a floppy genital, which is what Zelensky had in common with Churchill (I guess that’s what the media meant when comparing Z with Ch). So Ben is also disqualified.
        BUT I hear that Juan Guaido and Edmundo Gonzalez are great p*nis piano playing maestros, I mean, why else would the USA recognise them?

  3. JonnyJames

    2025-02-03 at 10:47

    Great article that connects dots and gives context. The hubris-filled imperial officials and oligarchs will be sadly disappointed if they think that they can put the genie back in the bottle. Living so far up an ivory tower, away from reality, for so long has made the powerful functionally insane.

    Mental illness is a requirement for oligarchs in the first place: I’m no psychologist but these f-ers are sick: narcissistic, sadistic, callous etc.; and should be considered as enemies of the 99%. Instead, the media cartel fawn over them, and tell us to worship them, they have a “divine right” to steal and hoard all the resources and power after all.

    This is really nothing new, but The DT2 regime has just made the oligarchy even more obvious, as well as “unmasking” the ugly face of empire, as Caity Johsntone, Chris Hedges, Ben Norton and other great journalists have written. Genocide Joe did a good job of unmasking the ugly face as well. Supporting the mass slaughter of unarmed civilians – women, children, elderly, doctors, nurses, journalists etc. is about as ugly as it gets.

    There is no such thing as “capitalism” as taught in the vast majority of schools and unis in the so-called west. Many people pointed that out after the crash of ’08 and the TBTF oligarchy-is-officially-above-the-law was out in the open. We have an authoritarian, kleptocratic oligarchy in charge, on display for the world to see.

    And there is no such thing as US democracy. Elections Inc. are merely public relations stunts and a means to run psy-ops on the public to make them believe they have a choice. Divide and rule and all that.

    Of course these parasite-sociopaths don’t want competition, they want extort more wealth for themselves.

    All of this institutionalized corruption will lead to the eventual collapse of the US empire. It’s not a matter of if, but when.

  4. Eric Arthur Blair

    2025-02-03 at 13:33

    I did previously allude to the observations that capitalism on a short term microeconomic scale can lead to lower prices and better quality, however on a long term macroeconomic scale if unregulated, capitalism leads to monopoly (replies to JeffR and Kim Singh)

    https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/08/16/us-china-oligarchy-consultative-democracy/#comment-14720

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related stories

Eurasia

What is the meaning of "multipolarity"? Donald Trump and Marco Rubio say "great power competition" with imperial spheres of influence. China and much of...

Economy

Donald Trump's tariffs will likely backfire, hurt the United States, and accelerate the decline of US dominance, argue political economists Radhika Desai, Michael Hudson,...

Opinion

Donald Trump's expansion of migrant detention in Guantánamo Bay follows years of torture. Meanwhile, the people of Cuba have always fought for their land...

Eurasia

Donald Trump plans to ethnically cleanse Palestinians, saying, "The US will take over the Gaza Strip... We'll own it". His son-in-law Jared Kushner has...