Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Eurasia

China & Russia strengthen friendship, blasting Western ‘neocolonialism’ & US militarism

Putin met with Xi Jinping in Beijing, where China and Russia released a joint statement blasting Western “colonialism and hegemonism”, supporting a multipolar world and more representation for the Global South, and calling for de-dollarization and expansion of BRICS.

China Russia West neocolonialism Xi Putin joint statement

As the United States imposes more and more sanctions on China and Russia, this has only driven the Eurasian powers closer together.

The leaders of the two countries convened in Beijing in May. It was their 43rd meeting.

There, Presidents Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin signed a joint statement commemorating the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations.

In the document, China and Russia blasted Western “colonialism and hegemonism”, called to build a more multipolar world with increased representation for the Global South, and expressed support for de-dollarization and expansion of BRICS.

Geopolitical Economy Report has published an unofficial machine translation of the full text of the joint statement. What follows is a summary of the main points addressed in the document.

China-Russia relations are “at their best level in history”

The joint statement emphasized that China-Russia relations “are now at their best level in history”, and that “this partnership is not a temporary measure”.

The Eurasian powers stressed, however, that their “comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era” is “characterized by non-alignment, non-confrontation, and non-targeting of third countries”.

Moscow expressed its support for the One China principle, opposing Taiwan separatism, while Beijing recognized Russia’s national security needs and firmly opposed external interference in its internal affairs.

Support for Global South

Commitments like these had been made before. What was more unique about this statement was how China and Russia highlighted “the rising status and strength of emerging powers in the Global South”.

Beijing and Moscow wrote that the growing influence of the Global South can “accelerate the redistribution of development potential, resources, and opportunities, favoring emerging markets and developing countries, and promoting the democratization of international relations”.

In this vein, they called for a “good and healthy atmosphere of international cooperation with Africa”. They also hoped to make “contributions to supporting African countries in solving African problems in an African way”.

China and Russia pledged to “deepen cooperation with ASEAN”, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and to “promote the consolidation of ASEAN’s central position in the multilateral framework of the Asia-Pacific region”.

At the same time, both countries affirmed their goal to “strengthen strategic cooperation on Latin American and Caribbean affairs”, mentioning important regional organizations like the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), and the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA). (Notably absent from their remarks was any mention of the US-dominated Organization of American States (OAS), which Washington has used to try to impose its political will on the region.)

“Building a multipolar world”

While maintaining that the Global South should have more representation, China and Russia noted, “In contrast, countries adhering to hegemonism and power politics are going against this trend, attempting to replace and subvert the recognized international order based on international law with a ‘rules-based order'”.

The Eurasian powers emphasized that they are “in the process of building a multipolar world”, and seek “an equitable and orderly multipolar world and the democratization of international relations”.

“Both sides believe that all countries have the right to independently choose their development models and political, economic, and social systems based on their national conditions and people’s will, opposing interference in the internal affairs of sovereign countries, unilateral sanctions without international law basis or UN Security Council authorization”, wrote Beijing and Moscow.

“Neocolonialism and hegemonism completely contradict the current trend of the times”, they emphasized.

In a clear message to the US and EU, China and Russia said they “call on relevant countries and organizations to stop adopting confrontational policies and interfering in the internal affairs of other countries, disrupting existing security architectures, building ‘small yards’ between nations, stirring up regional tensions, and advocating for bloc confrontation”.

In the statement, Xi and Putin also pledged to deepen military cooperation between their countries, including through joint training and exercises.

De-dollarization and trade in local currencies

China and Russia said they will further de-dollarize, planning to “increase the share of local currencies in bilateral trade, financing, and other economic activities”.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reported in April that more than 90% of bilateral trade between the neighbors is already done in their local currencies, the renminbi and ruble. The US dollar and euro have been almost entirely removed from the transactions.

The Financial Times reported this May that “economic links between the two sides are booming”. Bilateral trade between China and Russia reached $240 billion in 2023, a 26% increase in just one year.

In 2023, Russia overtook Saudi Arabia as the largest supplier of oil to China.

Expanding BRICS and strengthening Shanghai Cooperation Organization

In their May 2024 joint statement, China and Russia expressed support for further expanding BRICS, promising to “promote the integration of new members into existing BRICS cooperation mechanisms, and explore modes of cooperation among BRICS partner countries”.

They pledged to “continue to uphold the BRICS spirit, enhance the influence of the BRICS mechanism in international affairs and agenda-setting”.

Beijing and Moscow again urged de-dollarization, “effectively promoting dialogue on the use of local currencies, payment instruments, and platforms for BRICS trade transactions”.

They likewise endorsed calls to “enhance the representation of “global South” countries in the global economic governance system”.

“Both sides welcome the African Union’s membership in the G20 and are willing to make constructive efforts for the common interests of emerging markets and developing countries”, they wrote.

The Eurasian powers similarly hope to strengthen new multilateral bodies like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, so as “to play a greater role in building a new, just, and stable multipolar international order”.

Supporting the international law-based system centered in the UN

While Western government officials and media pundits have often accused China and Russia of being “revisionist” powers, Beijing and Moscow called in their joint statement for strengthening the international law-based system centered in the United Nations.

Xi and Putin made it clear that what they oppose is the attempt by the Western powers to replace this system with the vague concept of a so-called “rules-based international order”.

“Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to building a more just and stable multipolar international architecture, fully respecting and abiding by the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter unconditionally, and safeguarding true multilateralism”, they wrote.

The countries proposed to strengthen the Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations.

Condemning US militarism and “Cold War thinking”

China and Russia criticized the United States for militarizing the world, writing, “Both sides express serious concern once again about the United States’ attempts to disrupt strategic stability in order to maintain its absolute military advantage”.

Washington is trying to “normalize the deployment of missiles worldwide”, they said, adding, “Both sides strongly condemn these extremely destabilizing measures that directly threaten China and Russia’s security and will strengthen coordination and cooperation to address the US’ non-constructive and hostile policy of so-called ‘dual containment’ against China and Russia”.

“The United States clings to Cold War thinking and the mode of bloc confrontation, prioritizing ‘small-group’ security over regional peace and stability, posing a threat to the security of all countries in the region”, stated Xi and Putin. “The United States should cease such behavior”.

Peace in East Asia and on Korean peninsula

In their joint statement, China and Russia stressed that they “oppose US attempts to change the balance of power in Northeast Asia by expanding its military presence and cobbling together military groupings”.

In reference to North Korea (known officially as the DPRK), Beijing and Moscow wrote that they “oppose the US and its allies’ deterrent actions in the military field, provoking confrontation with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and aggravating tensions on the Korean Peninsula that could lead to armed conflict”.

“Both sides urge the United States to take effective measures to ease military tensions and create favorable conditions, abandon intimidation, sanctions, and suppression, and promote negotiations among North Korea and other relevant countries on the principle of mutual respect and consideration of each other’s security concerns”, they wrote, affirming that “political and diplomatic means are the only way to resolve all issues on the Korean Peninsula”.

They also expressed “serious concern about the consequences of the AUKUS trilateral security partnership in various fields for the strategic stability of the Asia-Pacific region”.

Opposing militarization of space

Beijing and Moscow were clear that they “oppose attempts by individual countries to militarize outer space”.

Both countries said they agreed “to promote the international initiative/political commitment not to deploy weapons first in outer space on a global scale”.

“To maintain world peace, ensure the equal and indivisible security of all countries”, they wrote.

Fighting climate change by providing financial transfer from Global North to South

On the issue of climate change, China and Russia reaffirmed “their commitment to the objectives, principles, and institutional framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Paris Agreement”.

They emphasized “the crucial importance of financial support from developed countries to developing countries for mitigating global average temperature rise and adapting to the adverse effects of global climate change”.

Xi and Putin similarly proposed working “with all parties to develop legally binding documents to address environmental pollution caused by plastic waste”.

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Eric Arthur Blair

    2024-05-26 at 02:18

    The joint communique is a scarcely disguised message from China and Russia to the hegemonic self-proclaimed exceptional indispensibles, saying:
    1. We are ready for all the dirty tricks, sabotage and warfare you are conducting against us. Do your worst, you goddamn motherf*ckers.
    2.You are irrelevant to our futures. We, together with the Global Majority, are comprehensively building a better world with BRICS, even as you and your quisling goons perpetrate genocide, even as you crooks collapse from the fraud of your Ponzi deindustrialised economies.
    3.F*ck your fools based disorder

  2. Eric Arthur Blair

    2024-05-26 at 17:23

    Collapse of the US financial economic system part 1:
    Why does the US government borrow money from the Fed, when it has the potential to issue money by itself?
    Must see heeelarious videoclip:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4LVJpfP_qK0
    Jared Bernstein is either an incompetent moron or is trying to cover up a shocking truth, intentionally never taught in schools, by giving a bumbling non-answer.
    Prof Richard Wolff said that banks were given the power to issue money in order to limit the monetary power of governments. That is not exactly correct.
    Prof Michael Hudson has explained things better. Apologies for the following looong text but it contains vital concepts essential for everyone to understand.
    The truth is this: most money in the world exists as debt, not as printed cash or as electronic savings. Banks create money out of nothing (so-called fractional reserve banking) when issuing mortgages or loans.
    When your mortgage for 500k is approved, 500k magically appears in your account which you then pay the house seller (who may go on a spending spree), but you owe the bank that 500k which you must pay back with interest over time. As that debt is gradually discharged, that money gradually disappears from circulation.
    Such sums are peanuts compared with the multiple billions involved in funding government agendas.
    In 1913 at Jekyll island, in a secret meeting of US private bankers, the idea of the US Federal Reserve was born. Corrupt politicians eyeing lucrative kickbacks then colluded to craft the US Federal Reserve Act that December. Woodrow Wilson was the first bought-and-paid-for US president, as all the rest have been ever since.
    Today, when the US government wants $60 billion for war, the US government issues treasury bonds out of nothing “worth” $60 billion, which they “sell” to the Fed who then electronically issue the cash to the US government for their spending spree. This is exactly like a mortgage issued by the Fed to the US taxpayer, payable with interest to the Fed over time.
    Long term outcome: the US taxpayer foots the bill, the Fed gets big money for nothing in the form of interest, a fee-for-no-service. It is a HUGE SCAM by the private banking industry to fleece the US taxpayer.
    The only reason why the USA has not faced hyperinflation is because of the unique status of the USD being the international reserve currency and their ability to export debt overseas when US treasury bonds are sold to foreign entities AKA suckers.
    But many foreign governments are now divesting from the USD, which means that the $35 trillion of US debt, which can never be paid off, will eventually end up being held by the USA itself, which means hyperinflation in the US and economic collapse.
    Why does the Fed exist at all? Why doesn’t the US government itself issue the $60 billion directly from a publicly owned central bank?
    That is indeed the case with China and the publicly owned Bank of China, where private bankers have little power and the taxpayers do NOT end up paying billions in interest to the private bankers, a fee-for-no-service.
    If the Chinese government wants to build high speed rail, the BOC simply creates and issues x billion yuan which Chinese taxpayers eventually pay back long term, and whatever interest charged (if any) goes into a public bank ie. interest payments go back to the public.
    If a major public project experiences a loss, that debt is simply written off by the Chinese government. This cannot happen in the USA because the Fed never writes off any debt and the US taxpayers are forced to keep paying the private banks for all failed projects, especially failed wars.
    This is one major difference between the US capitalist and Chinese socialist systems and the reason why the former is headed for collapse and the latter is far more stable (contrary to propaganda spewed out by the WSJ, Economist, Financial Times and other rags).
    The other reason the US economy will collapse soon is bursting of share market multi bubbles, especially fraudulent derivatives.

  3. Eric Arthur Blair

    2024-05-26 at 17:28

    Collapse of the US financial economic system part 2:
    The acceleration of Dedollarisation:
    China used to be the largest holder of US treasury bonds/bills at around USD$1.2 TRILLION. Since the USA started the new cold war, China has been shedding US Tbills and as of January 2024 held less than USD$800 billion. China recently sold another USD$53 billion which is an acceleration of their divestment.
    https://youtu.be/Jutm-rMwTwk?feature=shared
    It is no longer necessary to buy oil in US fiat currency, neither is the USD backed up by Industrial, Mineral or Agricultural output anywhere near that of China or Russia (who have also been acquiring the majority of gold reserves, which will add value to the emerging BRICS “Bancor” / SDR type international trading currency).
    Summary: dedollarization proceeds apace which portends the end of the US economy as a freeloading global parasite.
    https://youtu.be/uwgcjYIVKPI?feature=shared

  4. Eric Arthur Blair

    2024-05-27 at 23:07

    Collapse of the US financial economic system part 3:
    Is the USA the world’s largest oil producer? It depends on what you mean by produce and what you mean by oil. Their gross fake oil output is high but their net output is in reality bugger all. And it is fake oil*, not useful crude oil.
    Briefly: the USA is basically exhausted of high EROEI cheap oil, their conventional fields are tapped out. They have resorted to low EROEI expensive shale oil extraction which requires massive input of energy in the form of IMPORTED high EROEI oil. The USA can import the latter for free due to the privilege of the USD as petrodollar which will soon disappear. That, along with massive government subsidies, sucker investments and previous ZIRP policies allowed them to pursue the fool’s errand of light tight* oil or LTO extraction which has NEVER turned an overall profit. Suckers invested in shale because the share prices were artificially inflated by the shale companies themselves, due to stock buybacks.
    Conventional fields were geologically easy to find and took perhaps 30 to 40 years to reach peak production, then depleted by about 6% per year. Shale oil was hard to find, requiring the drilling of thousands of dry “plays” (high energy cost) until a sweetspot could be found, which typically reached peak production by 10 years, then dramatically depleted by more than 80% after around 4 years post peak.
    The Shale industry is insured by numerous derivatives which are undercapitalised and overvalued on the stock market.
    That entire fraudulent SCAM is scheduled to collapse soon due to implacable laws of PHYSICS. Only an ignorant turd brained jackass can argue against this.
    Now that the USD is losing its petrodollar privilege, the USA will NEVER be able to reindustrialise, which requires either domestic high EROEI cheap oil resources or the ability to import cheap oil in exchange for real world exported products and the USA today has neither.
    This is why the USA is so desperate to preserve its USD international reserve currency petrodollar privilege using all sorts of bullying thuggish dirty tricks, sabotage and warfare.
    Where is the last remaining high EROEI cheap oil in the world?
    Mainly Russia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran (who are in BRICS), Iraq, the Caspian area especially Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan.

    *low energy density, volatile, high APO, thus caused explosions of the “bomb” trains. Cannot make diesel from LTO so cannot power agriculture, industry, construction, trucks, trains with it.

    • Eric Arthur Blair

      2024-06-09 at 16:51

      *typo: not high APO, but high API gravity

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related stories

Eurasia

Ukraine is a "gold mine" with $12 trillion worth of critical minerals, US Senator Lindsey Graham insisted in a TV interview. He said the...

Eurasia

Polling shows 94% of people in the US and 88% in Western Europe want a negotiated settlement to end the war in Ukraine, but...

Eurasia

The presidents of China and Russia, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, signed a joint statement in Beijing in 2024. This is an unofficial English...

Eurasia

Iran's President Ebrahim Raisi, who died in a helicopter crash, sought to unite the Global South against Western imperialism. He joined BRICS, advocated de-dollarization,...