Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Economy

BRICS New Development Bank de-dollarizing, adding Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe as members

The BRICS bloc’s New Development Bank, an alternative to the US-dominated World Bank, is de-dollarizing its loans, promoting local currencies, and adding new members: Argentina, Saudi Arabia, and Zimbabwe.

New Development Bank NDB BRICS board directors
The board of directors of the New Development Bank meeting in April 2023

The BRICS bloc of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa is expanding, and building a new economic architecture to challenge the dominance of the US dollar.

One of the most important institutions created by the BRICS is the New Development Bank (NDB). This is a Global South-oriented alternative to the World Bank, which is located in and essentially controlled by the United States.

In March 2023, the NDB inaugurated its new chief: Dilma Rousseff, the former president of Brazil, from the South American nation’s leftist Workers’ Party.

Rousseff has stressed that the NDB’s goals are financing “infrastructure investments” and “helping our members combat poverty, create jobs, and promote environmentally sustainable development”.

She has also welcomed several more countries to join the bank.

Current NDB members include the five BRICS nations as well as Bangladesh, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt. Uruguay is already in the process of joining.

Rousseff revealed on June 1 that four more countries have been approved as new members: Argentina, Saudi Arabia, and Zimbabwe.

New Development Bank NDB members

Flags of the members of the BRICS bloc’s New Development Bank (NDB)

Rousseff said NDB leadership okayed these countries’ membership request, and the decision will officially be announced in August, at the summit of BRICS heads of state, which will tentatively be held in South Africa.

The new NDB president disclosed this news while Argentina’s economic minister, Sergio Massa, was visiting the bank’s headquarters in Shanghai, China.

Brazil’s President Lula da Silva, who helped found the BRICS during his first two terms in the 2000s, returned to office in January 2023.

Lula has played a key role in advocating for Argentina to join BRICS. In a summit of South American leaders in Brazil in May, Lula also endorsed Venezuela joining the bloc.

BRICS bank commits to de-dollarizing

On May 30 and 31, the New Development Bank held its annual meeting – the institution’s eighth since it began operations in 2015.

NDB President Rousseff used the special occasion to reiterate that the bank’s objective is eventual de-dollarization.

The short-term goal is to offer 30% of NDB loans in local currencies. This would be an increase from its present rate of 22%.

In April, Rousseff had first announced that the NDB plans to transition away from the US dollar, pledging that nearly one-third of its loan book will be financed in the currencies of member countries by 2026.

By diversifying its use of currencies, the NDB not only seeks to weaken the bloc’s dependence on the dollar, but also hopes to help developing countries avoid painful fluctuations in exchange rates.

The US dollar is the global reserve currency, so Washington’s domestic monetary policy has an impact on the world economy (a phenomenon known as the Triffin Dilemma).

Since March 2022, the US central bank, the Federal Reserve, has aggressively raised interest rates. This has put downward pressure on the currencies of many Global South nations, making it more expensive to import foreign products and pay off dollar-denominated debt, while also fueling capital flight.

“We need to create a diversified global currency system”, Rousseff said at the NDB annual meeting.

“In the future, it is unlikely that one single currency can dominate the world’s currency system. We will see more local currencies used to settle trade”, the NDB president added.

The New Development Bank has already issued bonds denominated in China’s currency, the renminbi.

Chinese Vice-Premier Ding Xuexiang said at the annual meeting of the BRICS bank that the “NDB is designed to better serve the emerging economies by financing more infrastructure construction and sustainable projects”.

Rousseff’s view, that the world is transitioning toward a multipolar currency order, has been acknowledged even by some Western mainstream media outlets and analysts.

The chair of the editorial board of the Financial Times newspaper, Gillian Tett, implored investors in March to “Prepare for a multipolar currency world“.

Prominent economist Zoltan Pozsar wrote in the Financial Times in January that the “unipolar era” of US hegemony is over, and has been replaced with a “multipolar” order of “one world, two systems”.

Pozsar, whom the financial press dubbed a “superstar”, noted that “the pace of de-dollarisation appears to have picked up”, with more and more BRICS-curious countries trading in their own currencies.

“If less trade is invoiced in US dollars and there is a dwindling recycling of dollar surpluses into traditional reserve assets such as Treasuries, the ‘exorbitant privilege’ that the dollar holds as the international reserve currency could be under assault”, Pozsar warned.

How the World Bank is controlled by the United States

Unlike the World Bank, the New Development Bank is a truly multilateral institution, not one dominated by a lone power.

The 2014 founding agreement stated that the NDB’s “initial subscribed capital shall be equally distributed amongst the founding members”, and the “voting power of each member shall equal its subscribed shares in the capital stock of the Bank”.

No country has veto power in the NDB.

The NDB founding agreement likewise stated: “The President of the Bank shall be elected from one of the founding members on a rotational basis, and there shall be at least one Vice President from each of the other founding members”.

The World Bank is completely different. This institution is essentially controlled by the United States, and physically headquartered in Washington, DC.

The bank clearly states on its website that the United States “remains the largest shareholder of the World Bank Group today”, boasting that, “As the only World Bank Group shareholder that retains veto power over certain changes in the Bank’s structure, the United States plays a unique role in influencing and shaping global development priorities”.

The bank’s website likewise admits, “Traditionally, the World Bank President has always been been a U.S. citizen nominated by the United States”.

The United States has 15.81% voting power in the World Bank Group’s lending arm, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). No other country even remotely comes close.

world bank top 8 countries voting power graph

In second place in voting power is Japan, with 7.22%. Despite having four times the US population, China has a vote share of just 5.60%. Germany has 4.30%, and Britain 3.81%.

India, with a population of more than 1.4 billion, is tied with France, which has a population of less than 66 million; each has 3.81% of the voting power in the World Bank.

Russia has a mere 2.88%. Canada has 2.56%, and Italy 2.50%.

world bank top 8 countries voting power chart

The World Bank acts as a kind of neocolonial institution, dominated by the Western powers.

It is not so much the World Bank as it is the Washington Bank.

Along with its Bretton Woods financial sibling the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which is similarly dominated by the United States, the World Bank is notorious for trapping Global South countries in odious debt.

When debtor countries are unable to pay back the World Bank (or IMF), the US-controlled institution frequently imposes harsh neoliberal economic policies, as part of a “structural adjustment” program, requiring the government to cut social services, lower wages, slash pensions, reduce spending on healthcare and education, end subsidies, privatize state-owned enterprises, and deregulate markets.

Former consultant John Perkins, in his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, described the World Bank as an “agent of global empire” that helps “cheat” poor countries in the Global South “out of trillions of dollars”, and subsequently “funnel money … into the coffers of huge corporations and the pockets of a few wealthy families who control the planet’s natural resources”.

Perkins added that the “economic hit men” at the World Bank and similar US-dominated institutions “play a game as old as empire”.

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Eric Arthur Blair

    2023-06-07 at 12:44

    Below is the best summary ever of the monumental geopolitical earthquakes rocking our world today from a decades-long veteran eyewitness:
    Audio: https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/leothepanthera/us-dollar-will-be-dead-in-jGc5qk9rBiC/
    Video: https://youtu.be/SF_nMsIk8hc
    Escobar contradicts his fellow Brazilian, Dilma Rousseff. She said the NDB plan was to have 30% of their loans denominated in nonUSD by 2026*. He says this is far too long a timeline, he can see dedollarisation happening by 2025.
    Why do I believe Pepe over the President of the NDB? Because the belligerent Beltway buffoons have declared their intention to incite war with China by 2025 and the best way to pull the rug out from under the feet of those CAWPs** is to destroy their means of funding war, as I commented about here:
    https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2023/05/10/ny-times-dedollarization-michael-hudson-paul-krugman-dollar/#comments

    *could this be a Sun Tsu move? If you are weak, deceive your enemy that you are strong. If you are strong, deceive your enemy that you are weak. If you plan to act quickly, deceive your enemy that you will move slowly. The chequer playing CAWPs** have repeatedly played into the hands of the chess playing Russians over Ukraine, Russia has outmaneuvered them in every vital matter.
    **Chickenshit Armchair Warmongering Psychopaths AKA belligerent Beltway buffoons.

    • Eric Arthur Blair

      2023-06-08 at 22:25

      An unmistakable sign that dedollarisation is being turbocharged will be if China decides to use its trillion USD reserves to buy the debt of potential BRICS countries like Argentina and Turkeyi, to denominate their new debt in RMB under extremely favourable terms, perhaps near zero interest, to be repaid in the form of commodity exports to China over several decades. This will have the effect of immediately ceasing and reversing the crippling inflation facing Argentina and Turkei as a result of extortionate IMF/World Bank loans.

  2. Cure E Us

    2023-06-08 at 11:36

    US’ gangster capitalism only needs to look in the mirror to reveal the culprit responsible for world destabilization. The United States sows seeds of chaos – through illegal economic sanctioning, regime change, arms profiteering to contracted agitators on foreign soil, etc. – like a farmer desires to plant, nurture, and harvest a new crop. However, unlike the farmer, the USA deliberately intends to obstruct efforts at self-determining, pirate plundered resources, and perpetually repress populations under oppressive debt-slavery (e.g.- IMF). BRICS, and other like-minded groups, have the right to recruit members and coalesce to defend themselves from US’ gangster capitalism. Considering US atrocious misdeeds, de-dollarization was inevitable.

  3. Eric Arthur Blair

    2023-06-09 at 19:32

    How can China purchase (for example) Argentinian USD denominated debts, to be restructured into non-USD currency, under terms extremely favourable to Argentina, which will have the effect of freeing such prey countries from their unpayable debt slavery to the West and alleviating runaway Argentinian inflation?
    On further reflection I doubt China will directly buy Argie USD debts using China owned US treasury bonds, replacing Argie debt directly with Chinese Yuan, payable by the Argies in the form commodity exports to China, which could morph into a future higher rate if the Yuan appreciates. The combination of devaluation of the debtor currency (vs creditor currency) and usurious compound interest, are what make Western predatory debts unpayable ad infinitum.

    A better arms-length strategy will be to involve the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) and the new BRICS International Currency, lets call it the BIC, very soon to be formed. How will that work?

    China can capitalise the NDB by injecting billions of Yuan and billions of China owned US Treasury Bonds into the NDB coffers. These can be converted to the BIC within the NDB according to the prevailing exchange rate, which will fluctuate according to world economic circumstances. However the BIC itself should not fluctuate significantly with regard to commodities. The BIC value will be permanently tied to a basket of material commodities. This has the effect of tying price to value, unlike a completely fiat currency system which, when Ponzified, can convince stupid people that one tulip bulb is worth the same as a house, or that Farcebook corporation is worth $100 billion USD, a universe where price is divorced from value.

    Argentina, a new BRICS+ member, now applies to the NDB for debt restructuring. Argentina gets a loan from the NDB for X billion BICs which is equivalent to Y billion USD, the total sum it owes to the World Bank and/or IMF. The NDB then issues Y billion USD to Argentina in the form of US Treasury Bonds, which Argentina then uses to pay off the totality of its debt to the West. Argentina now owes the NDB X billion BICs, which is payable to the NDB over several decades at a very low interest rate. Argentina can earn BICs (and pay off its debt) by selling commodities NOT ONLY to China, but to any other BRICS+ country, and in that way China cannot be accused of being Argentina’s debt overlord.

    This is a win-win arrangement because it will enable China to quickly dispose of its USD denominated foreign reserves (vulnerable to being seized / frozen by the US Mafia Deep State) and enable Argentina to escape US inflicted perpetual debt penury which is also causing hyperinflation.

    Note that the BIC will never be used by any individual country as its domestic currency (which is unlikely to work), it will only be used as an international intermediate medium of exchange.

    Interested in what Profs Desai and Hudson may think of this.

  4. Gitte Hector

    2023-07-05 at 00:55

    Thanks for a very insightful article.
    Just one small comment: I bought John Perkins’ Confessions of an Economic hit man, and is surprised to see that in this book’s third edition which is the only one I can buy at Amazon.com as kindle book, Economic hit men guilty of the offenses are supposed to be American and Chinese alike. Has anybody else seen that?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related stories

Economy

These were the most important geopolitical and economic issues of 2023, including the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, US-China tensions, BRICS expansion, growing de-dollarization,...

Economy

A new kind of globalization is being born, and the political future of the BRICS+ and the Global South in general depends greatly on...

Eurasia

A geopolitical analysis of why the United States so strongly supports Israel: Economist Michael Hudson discusses with journalist Ben Norton.

Economy

Economist Michael Hudson details how BRICS could create a mutual settlement currency for payment imbalances among central banks and build an alternative to the...